PCC Participants Meeting Summary
ALA Midwinter January 31,1999
Philadelphia, PA
The
Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) held its semi-annual participants
meeting in conjunction with the ALA Midwinter Conference at the Marriott
Hotel from 7:00 P.M. to 8:30 P.M. on Sunday, January 31, 1999. PCC
participants and guests were welcomed by Chair, Sally Sinn. Sinn
presented awards of special recognition to Michael Kaplan for his
efforts with and work as the chair of the Standing Committee on Automation
and to Liz
Bishoff for her participation on the PCC Policy Committee, her leadership
of the CONSER program and for her vision and support for cooperative
cataloging in unifying the two programs. Colleen Hyslop was also
awarded a certificate of appreciation in absentia for her outstanding
contributions as NACO representative in drafting the consolidation
of the PCC and CONSER Strategic Plan, in producing well-written articles
to publicize the program, and in otherwise assisting the PCC to achieve
its goals and objectives.
Sinn announced that new materials have been added to the PCC web site, including
two data-gathering models developed by the Standing Committee on Standards
(SCS) to assess the use of the core record standard for both original cataloging
as well as copy cataloging operations. Also announced was the approval and
posting of the core record standard for rare books (DCRB core). She welcomed
new NACO and BIBCO participants into the PCC family.
Progress reports of the component programs (CONSER, BIBCO, NACO, and
SACO) of
the PCC were then given.
Jean
Hirons, CONSER Coordinator, spoke about her work with AACR revision
which is focused on serial-related topics and announced that group
reports were available on the web. Hirons reported that the Task
Force on AACR revision had met Friday, January 29, 1999 to discuss
the reports and recommendations to be included in her report to the
Joint Steering Committee (JSC) due April 1, 1999. The JSC will make
the report available for world-wide review soon thereafter. Highlights
of recommendations include application of successive and latest entry
conventions should be applied to electronic journals; description
of serials and electronic journals including replacing "chief source
of information" with "chief source of title"; and examining methodologies
for handling title changes.
CONSER established a working group in 1998 to investigate ways
in which toprovide access to journals in aggregator databases. Members
of the group were Ruth Haas (Harvard), Karen Calhoun (Cornell), Jeanne
Baker (U. Maryland), and John Riemer (U. Georgia). The group conducted
a survey of the library community about aggregator databases; of
the 62 responses, 71% wanted access through their OPAC, and 32 institutions
expressed a willingness to work with CONSER exploring metadata or
creating records. Hirons closed by mentioning possible follow-up
activities, including: 1) working with vendors to suggest product
improvements, which will be done by a task force of the Standing
Committee on Automation; 2) working to define a brief record; 3)
exploring the use of metadata or other vendor-supplied data that
could be enhanced, and 4) developing of partnerships with non-CONSER
libraries and vendors. She also announced a new initiative to explore
the inclusion of MARC holdings fields containing publication pattern
data and related holdings in CONSER records. Diane Hillmann (Cornell)
will be leading this effort.
Ana
Cristán, Acting BIBCO Coordinator, presented a summary report
of the first BIBCO-At-Large meeting held during the Midwinter Conference.
Highlights included a discussion of the timely processing of PCC
participant classification proposals and other SACO issues, maintaining
the quality of records in a shared cataloging environment, maintaining
BIBCO documentation, and recruiting of additional BIBCO trainers.
A detailed report of the BIBCO-At-Large meeting can be found
on the BIBCO home page.
Ruta
Penkiunas, Acting Team Leader of the Cooperative Cataloging Team,
provided the audience with a review of the achievements of NACO and
SACO participants in the program. She particularly emphasized the
valuable role that the international partners are beginning to play
in the PCC and welcomed both the Universidade de Sao Paulo and El
Colegio de México into the Program, which opened the doors
to Latin American participation. NACO also had a significant highlight
during the past year in welcoming its first Historically Black College
and University (HBCU), Bowie State University, into the PCC Program.
Recently, Moorland-Springarn Research Center Library of Howard University
and the Howard University School of Law Library, both in the District
of Columbia, have also become members.
Penkiunas noted that approved SACO subject proposals increased
by 3.4% in FY1998 while submission and approval of classification
numbers went up 28%. In support of these SACO contributions, the
Coop Team identified, initiated or executed 6,495 changes to bibliographic
records in the LC database, an increase of 53% over FY1997. SACO
libraries contributed 30% of all new subjects added to Library
of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) in FY1998.
The chairs of each of the standing committees next provided a synopsis
of
current activities and issues with which they are grappling.
Karen
Calhoun (Cornell), Chair of the Standing Committee on Automation
(SCA), began by announcing that both authority macros available through
the utilities were up-to-date in that they included the new MARC
format changes, implemented in January 1999. The Task Group on OCLC
Batchloading, chaired by Carol Hixson (UCLA), had been charged with
advising OCLC about batchloading issues for the PCC. Their final
report should be available soon and will be mounted on the PCC homepage.
On the SCA plate is the issue of exploring potential for real-time
uploading of records, particularly with RLIN. The committee is also
to examine and make recommendations about cataloging tools that are
now available and determine an effective method to disseminate information
about these tools to catalogers; this task is hopefully to be completed
by ALA Annual Meeting in New Orleans. SCA members will also be working
with vendors of aggregator databases with findings to be brought
to the Operations Committees meetings in April.
Ed Glazier, of the Research Libraries Group, then reported on the
authority record assistant for NACO contributors to reduce the amount
of original keying when creating new authority records in the RLIN
copy of the name authority file. The first phase was unveiled on
January 20; phase two, to be implemented later in 1999, will allow
the creation of an authority record from a local bibliographic record
using Z39.50. Expected availability is scheduled for mid-February
1999.
Glenn Patton spoke about importing original cataloging records
to OCLC. This capability is supported with CatME version 1.10 and
CJK 3.0; it is currently available for downloading and available
to all OCLC members at no additional charge. The CD-ROM will be available
at a later date. Patton described the process for import by saying
that one must first start with or create a USMARC-based file, start
the OCLC software and select Tools........Import. Original cataloging
records are imported in correct bibliographic workforms and can be
added via batchloading; OCLC will issue the participating institution
full online credit. To download the software he provided the URLS:
for CATME click here or for the CJK click
here Patton reminded participants that they must be logged on
as enhanced members to take advantage of this software.
Joan
Schuitema (Loyola University, Chicago), Chair of the Standing Committee
on Standards (SCS), publicly thanked departing committee members
Bill Garrison (U. Colorado) and Willy Cromwell-Kessler (Detroit Public)
for their hard work and dedication to the committee's work. The committee
has been expanded to include three new members Susan Summer (Columbia),
Colleen Hyslop (Michigan State), and Cathy Winzer (Stanford). Schuitema
also issued a call for new members to replace those who will be leaving
the committee in the Fall.
News on the core record front focused attention on the core "template" that
has been approved for rare books (DCRB). It is to be used in conjunction with
the existing book core record. The computer files core record approved
by SCS on January 30th, is also of a template variety; the committee
will forward this core template to the PCC Policy Committee (PoCo).
A third template, approved by the SCS, to be called the Core standard
for multiple character sets is also to be used with all formats currently
available. This is a revision of the "Additional requirements for
core records containing non-Latin scripts" and will be sent to the
PCC PoCo for comment..
Schuitema announced three projects on which the SCS is working
where input from the PCC participants is needed. Data-gathering models
have been placed on the PCC homepage with model A used to assess
the efficacy of original cataloging at the core level. Model B is
designed to measure efficacy of copy cataloging using the core record.
Solicitation of responses for collection level core had been requested
by January 15th; in an effort to obtain additional responses, the
deadline has been extended until February 15, 1999.
A Cross-Reference Task Force, chaired by Linda Barnhart (UC, San Diego), has
been formed and is charged with the investigating streamlining of cross references
on authority records. For a list of members and the charge click
here
Joan
Swanekamp (Yale), Chair of the Standing Committee on Training (SCT),
announced new appointees to the committee including Carol Hixson
(UCLA), Louisa Kreider (Cleveland Public), and Wayne Jones (MIT).
Swanekamp also announced that a "Training the BIBCO Trainer" will
be held in the Fall of 1999 and sounded the call for new trainers
to participate as well as the opportunity for current trainers who
may be interested to refresh their skills. Swanekamp spoke about
the upcoming Cataloging Now! Institute to be held at SUNY Buffalo
in April and suggested that other possible locations include Ohio
and the West Coast. Swanekamp also touched on the impending revision
of the Cataloging Now! script.
The
last portion of the meeting focused on current training initiatives.
Glenn Patton (OCLC) provided an in-depth analysis of the three Cataloging
Now! Institutes which have been held; in his presentation entitled "What
Can We Say ... After Three Presentations?" The script for the Institutes
includes an introduction to the PCC, addressing which libraries should
participate and why. The current cataloging environment is appraised,
followed by the description of the core record, i.e., what is the
core record and what are the benefits derived from using it as the
cataloging standard. In the afternoon, breakout sessions are held
for each of the three intended audiences; 1) catalogers, 2) technical
services managers, and 3) public services librarians. The Institute
concludes with a wrap-up session which discusses why the core record
is a good substitute for full level cataloging. The following table
provides an overview of the participants of these three Institutes.
| Analysis of attendance
at Cataloging Now! Institutes |
| Location |
Catalogers |
Technical Services
Managers |
Public Services
Librarians |
| Anaheim |
30 |
10 |
3 |
| Worcester |
65 |
34 |
10 |
| Dallas |
50+ |
18 |
6 |
The Institutes also generated feedback from each of the three groups.
Catalogers felt a little "tense"during the institute, but felt that
the morning "general session" was okay. Catalogers were more interested
in knowing what the implementation of the core record meant for their
institution, and they voiced concern about losing the "value-added" records
for their users. On the other hand, technical services managers expressed
their feelings by saying that they were already quite familiar with
the PCC's "new values." They are primarily looking for help with
1) knowing how to educate catalogers who are still mired in cataloging
details, 2) knowing how to communicate PCC values to higher levels
of management, and 3) justifying participation in cooperative programs.
Public services librarians range from feeling that they already have
open lines of communication with technical services colleagues; many
of them are required to wear more than one hat in that they have "split" assignments.
The overwhelming concern with the core record was deciding what kind
of access to material is lost and if it is that much faster in getting
materials on to the shelves. Following Patton's presentation, several
audience questions were fielded and sparked some discussion.
Kate
Harcourt (Columbia) and John Sluk (Oberlin) presented their individual
BIBCO training experiences, cleverly including a recruitment appeal
for new BIBCO trainers into their respective presentations. The next
BIBCO Training the Trainer is now scheduled for the Fall of 1999.
Harcourt began her thoughts with a definition of BIBCO training and
achieved her goal by defining what BIBCO training is not. Sluk addressed
PCC and BIBCO participation from the standpoint of a small institution,
explaining that membership in PCC is not limited to sizable academic
libraries. He also tempted the audience by relating how the self-esteem
of his staff had risen with being able to participate in the program.
Jean Hirons then closed the evening with her discussion of the
Serials Cooperative Cataloging Training Program (SCCTP). The goal
of that program is to provide authoritative and affordable training
for all who catalog serials by providing authoritative training manuals,
by training experienced serials catalogers to serve as trainers,
and by encouraging sponsorship of training workshops. Hirons stated
that the training materials for the basic serials cataloging workshop,
which is designed for classroom presentation, will cover print and
electronic serial publications, both original and copy. The session
is designed to be held in a two day period, with the ability to lengthen
or shorten the course. Materials, available in June, will be sold
by the Cataloging Distribution Service at the Library of Congress
and will include the instructor's manual, the trainee's manual, and
PowerPoint disks. The first two SCCTP Training-the-Trainer programs
will be held in June in conjunction with NASIG and ALA with funding
supplied by NASIG and the OCLC networks. Requirements include having
serials cataloging experience, possession of up-to-date CONSER documentation,
and some training experience. Hirons reminded the audience that application
deadline is February 15th. Hirons also stated that institutions wishing
to set up a workshop need to set a time and place with an estimate
of the number of participants and that she will serve as contact
person for these new SCCTP workshops. Hirons promised that additional
information will soon be available and posted on the CONSER
web site
The meeting closed in sufficient time to allow participants to
retire to their favorite lounge to catch the final quarter of Super
Bowl XXXIII.
|