Guidelines for Evaluation of Core Records

Many libraries that produce core level cataloging may wish to evaluate the core record standard in order to determine if it offers a cost-effective alternative to full-level or minimal-level cataloging or to evaluate its impact on copy cataloging operations. Others may wish to try to gauge its usefulness in providing acceptable access to collections. The Standing Committee for Standards (SCS) has developed data gathering models which are designed as aids in reporting such evaluative efforts to the PCC so that the results of the trials may be more easily generalized and compared. They are intended to provide a framework for reporting core record evaluations, indicating necessary information to include. They may also be used as guidelines to aid in the design of trials of core record efficacy.

BIBCO participants are strongly encouraged to undertake these evaluations and share such information with program participants and with the PCC Steering Committee. Information that these studies yield can give valuable feedback which can effect development of PCC standards and/or provide information needed for long-range planning of Program goals and objectives.

Separate models have been devised for the following cases and are now available for use:

Model A: Information to be reported when communicating the efficacy of core level cataloging in original cataloging operations.

Model B: Information to be reported when communicating the impact of core level cataloging on copy cataloging operations.

Model C: Information to be reported when communicating the efficacy of core level cataloging from
the patron perspective.

Model C: Revised with FRBR tasks: Information to be reported when communicating the efficacy of core level cataloging from the patron perspective.

Any interested parties who would like to submit a proposal for undertaking a core record evaluation under the auspices of the PCC using these models are encouraged to contact the Chair of the SCS or any member of the PCC Policy Committee for more information.