NACO Training Workshop Evaluation Form

On a scale of 1-5 (5 being the highest value) rate the following aspects of the workshop by clicking on the button befor the number desired. (Choose one from each line)

Q1. The content of the workshop:
a. Was extremely valuable:

was of little value

b. Provided enough detail:

was too general

c. Was cohesive and logical:

fragmented/difficult to follow

d. Was appropriate to my needs:

not at all appropriate

e. Met its stated objectives:

did not meet objectives

Direct questions to: Carolyn Sturtevant, NACO coordinator
cast@loc.gov, (202.707.4551)

Comments on workshop:

Q2. The presenter: f. Was knowledgeable:	5	4	3	2	1	was unsure of the material
g. Had good presentation skills:	5	4	3	2	1	had poor presentation skills
h. Encourage participation:	5	4	3	2	1	discouraged participation
i. Addressed my level of understanding:	5	4	3	2	1	did not consider my level of understanding
j. Answered questions well:	5	4	3	2	1	did not answer questions
k. Was prepared:	5	4	3	2	1	was not prepared
l. Understood audience dynamics:	5	4	3	2	1	ignored audience dynamics

Comments on presenter:

Q3. The training materials: m. Are excellent:	5	4	3	2	1	are poor
n. Followed course content:	5	4	3	2	1	are disjointed/out of sequence
o. Are valuable for future use:	5	4	3	2	1	are of no value

Comments on materials:

Comments on presentation materials:

Q5. Overall, the NACO workshop: t. Pace was excellent:	5	4	3	2	1	pace was not appropriate
u. Was too long:	5	4	3	2	1	was too short
v. Was well organized:	5	4	3	2	1	was not well organized
w. Exceeded my expectations:	5	4	3	2	1	was disappointing
x. Increased my knowledge on the topics presented:	5	4	3	2	1	added nothing to my knowledge on the topics presented
y. Was a good value:	5	4	3	2	1	was too expensive
z. Was excellent overall:	5	4	3	2	1	was poor overall

Comments overall:

Comments:

The Library of Congress >> Cataloging >> PCC Home
October 16, 2009