Standing Committee on Automation: Annual Report 2003
October 1, 2002-Sept. 30, 2003
(including quarterly report for July-Sept. 2003)
Most of the work of the Standing Committee on Automation during 2002-2003
was carried on by its two currently active task groups: the Third Task Group
on Journals in Aggregator Databases, and the Task Group on Linking Entry Displays.
Third Task Group on Journals in Aggregator Databases
This task group is chaired by Adolfo Tarango of the University of California,
San Diego. The nature of the task group's charge was considerably altered.
The original charge involved encouraging vendors of aggregator packages to
supply high quality bibliographic records as part of the packages. This charge
had obviously become outmoded by developments in the field - specifically,
by the rise of serials management companies, which assist libraries in keeping
track of the various aggregations to which they subscribe, and provide the
libraries with various types of related products such as "A to Z lists" of
electronic journal subscriptions that can be loaded to library Web sites.
One of the most useful products that a serials management company can sell
is a suite of full MARC records that cover the serials in all the aggregations
to which a library subscribes. The best guarantee that such records will be
of high quality is to have CONSER provide them. Once CONSER adopted the "aggregator
neutral single record" approach to serials in aggregator databases, this became
a feasible option. Consequently, the Third Task Group on Journals in Aggregator
Databases was issued a revised charge to assist CONSER in meeting this goal.
Specifically, the task group has worked on identifying the various data elements
that would need to be added to, modified, or removed from a CONSER record for
a non-electronic journal in order to create an aggregator neutral record for
the electronic version of that same journal. A draft document outlining those
data elements was discussed at the May CONSER Operations Meeting. A final version
of the document is still due from the task group. Subsequently, the task group
has been working with OCLC to apply the recommendations in the draft on a test
bed of titles available from Lexis-Nexis.
Task Group on Linking Entry Displays
This task group is chaired by Mechael Charbonneau of Indiana University.
It has examined the way linking entries are handled in the integrated library
systems of several different major vendors (DRA Classic, VTLS Classis, Ex Libris,
Endeavor, Sirsi, and Innovative Interfaces). It has begun to establish criteria
for assessing the effectiveness with which the various systems handle linking
entries and to consider the types of functionality needed for getting the most
use out of linking entries.
Meetings
Standing Committee on Automation held only one face-to-face meeting in 2002-2003,
at ALA Midwinter. No meeting was held at the Annual Meeting in Toronto because
of the absence of a number of members. The committee instead held a virtual
meeting via e-mail to conduct the business that otherwise would have been transacted
in Toronto. Discussion during the virtual meeting focused on assignments made
to the committee in the PCC Strategic Plan. Specifically:
1.2.1 Encourage ILS vendors to develop automated authority generators
and the means for their real-time upload to utilities. Ed Glazier of
RLG suggested that this might be an ill-formed or premature charge. He felt
that "before going down this road ... there should be conversations with the
utilities as to the feasibility of accepting uploaded authority records from
multiple local system vendors for multiple institutions." Specifically, he
was concerned about the practical problem that would be faced by the utilities
in detecting and dealing with duplicate authority records. He went on to
say, "The only real way to reduce the number of duplicates would be for these
records to be uploaded in real time to LC [instead of to the utilities]." With
this in mind, an alternative charge was suggested: "Encourage ILS vendors
to develop automated authority generators and the means for their real-time
upload to LC." SCA will work back with PCC to re-examine the charge and consider
alternatives prior to undertaking any work on it.
1.2.2 Streamline notification to LC of bibliographic file maintenance
resulting from NACO heading changes. David Williamson reported that he
was working with Glenn Patton of OCLC on this, and suggested that SCA might
lobby RLIN to "jump on the bandwagon to get the JACKPHY records updated,
if affected by a heading change."
1.3.1 Develop specifications for bibliographic and pattern notification
services such that they could be implemented by bibliographic utilities,
subscription agencies, consortia, or other service bureaus in a cost-effective
manner, and effectively utilized by libraries. Helen Gbala reported that
the NISO/EDItEUR Joint Working Party for the Exchange of Serials Subscription
Information, on which she serves, was working on this already, and promised
to keep SCA informed of that group's activities. Since any work that SCA
might do in this arena could be duplicative of the work of the Joint Working
Party, it was suggested that SCA go back to PCC and request that this charge
be amended or dropped.
3.6.1 Contact ILS vendors to encourage development of automated tools
for enhancing bibliographic access (e.g., TOC etc. or interoperability with
other information sources (in cooperation with Operations Committee);
3.6.2 Contact ILS vendors to encourage research to facilitate use and
usefulness of records in a global context (e.g., multilingual mapping of
subject headings) (in cooperation with Operations Committee). Since both
of these charges call for SCA to do something "in cooperation with Operations
Committee," the SCA chair has contacted the chair and chair-elect of PCC
for advice about the respective roles of SCA and the Operations Committee.
3.6.4 Contact ILS vendors to seek development of automated tools for classification
and cuttering; 3.6.5 Contact ILS vendors to encourage compliance with
levels 1, 2, 3 and/or 4 of the series heading normalization algorithms identified
in the Final Report of the Task Group on Series Numbering. The SCA chair
has officially communicated the reports of the SCA Task Group on Automated
Classification (2001) and the Task Group on Series Numbering to the following
system vendors: Ex Libris, Geac, Innovative Interfaces, Sirsi, and Endeavor.
With Dynix, those are the vendors of the systems used by the PCC member libraries.
It can be anticipated that SCA will continue to receive assignments to "contact
ILS vendors to...." Channels of communication between SCA and the major ILS
vendors will accordingly be established and maintained.
Membership
Thanks go to SCA members Ruth Bogan, Katherine Kott, John Riemer, and Gary
Strawn, and to liaisons Robert Bremer (OCLC), Helen Gbala (vendors), Ed Glazier
(RLG), John Levy (CONSER), and David Williamson (LC) for their participation
and involvement. The terms of Ruth Bogan and Gary Strawn are expiring; it will
be necessary for SCA to identify and bring on board two additional members
as replacements.
Report respectfully submitted by Gary Charbonneau, chair 09/17/2003
|