Skip Navigation Links The Library of Congress >> Cataloging
Program for Cooperative Cataloging - Library of Congress
  PCC Home >> Standards
Find in

Cross Reference Task Group : Members and Charge

Members of the Task Group

Linda Barnhart
Chair
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, CA
voice: 619.534.2767
fax: 619.534.0189
email:lbarnhart@ucsd.edu
John Attig
Pennsylvania State University
State College, PA
voice: 814.865.1755
fax: 814.863.7293
email:jca@psulias.psu.edu
Sherman Clarke
New York University
New York, NY
phone: 212.998.2462
fax: 212. 995.4366
email:clarkes@elmerl.bobst.nyu.edu
Steven Hearn
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, MN 55455
voice: 612. 625.2328
fax: 612. 625.3428
email:s-hear@tc.umn.edu
Rhoda Kesselman
Princeton University Libraries
Princeton, NJ 08544-2098
voice: 609.258.5167
fax: 609. 258.0441
email: rhodak@princeton.edu

Chris Martyn
Authorities Team
British Library
Boston Spa, Wetherby
West Yorkshire LS23 7BQ, UK
voice 441.937.546.802
fax: 441.937.546.979
email:chris.martyn@mail.bl.uk

Adam Schiff
University of Washington
Seattle, WA
voice: 206.543.8409
fax: 206.685.8782
email:aschiff@u.washington.edu
Manon Theroux
Sterling Memorial Library
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520-8240
voice: 203.432.1702
fax: 203. 432.7231
email: manon.theroux@yale.edu
 

Statement of the situation

The current provisions for creating cross references were initially developed for manual catalogs, and the instructions for making such references are scattered in disparate sources. Although the provisions have changed from time to time, there has been no systematic review from the perspective of the machine-readable environment. There may be some references that are no longer necessary. In addition, there are existing restrictions, exceptions, and conditions governing their use in specific cases that pose problems for consistent application by catalogers and are impediments to system-generated references in authority records.
Catalogers have also voiced dissatisfaction with the current presentation for cross references in AACR2 and in the LCRIs. Currently, the provisions for references are dispersed among specific rules in AACR2r, and Chapter 26 of AACR2r with the LCRIs to specific rules paralleling this layout.

Charge

Assuming an environment of computerized bibliographic control, review the provisions for references stated in AACR2r and the associated LCRIs to determine how the current complement of guidelines for references could be adjusted to accommodate efficiency and simplicity in cataloging as well as the change from a manual to an automated environment.

Conduct a review of current provisions with a view to:

  • identifying a basic set of references appropriate to different types of headings in most library catalogs, and determining when additional references might be appropriate;
  • continuing to meet the needs of a broad range of interests of a widely-shared authority system;
  • ensuring the integrity of a file that must be subject to a careful set of file management considerations;
  • reducing the number of restrictions and exceptions to an absolute minimum;
  • determining if any references should be eliminated or added.
  • determining the presentation of reference provisions that would best serve catalogers, e.g., associating them with specific rules, associating them with a specific chapter, presenting them combined together in a single chapter, some other presentation, or keeping the current one.

Deliverables

  1. Recommendations for rule changes to AACR2r for consideration by CC:DA.
  2. Recommendations for changes or additions to the LCRIs for consideration by LC.
  3. Recommendations on how best to present the complement for provisions regarding references to assist ease of use by catalogers.

Time frame: Final report due June 1999

Top of Page Top of Page
  PCC Home >> Standards
Find in
  The Library of Congress >> Cataloging
  January 3, 2008
Contact Us  
BIBCO CONSER NACO SACO Program for Cooperative Cataloging Home