User Feedback on Classification Web


This pilot version of Classification Web is being made available to the library community by the Library of Congress Cataloging Distribution Service (CDS). The intent of the pilot is to solicit feedback on this platform's viability as a future subscription product. We would greatly appreciate your completing this questionnaire to provide specific information about your experience with Classification Web. You may also send comments to the pilot test coordinator, Cheryl C. Cook at ccoo@loc.gov. For additional information on CDS and its products check the Classification Web Contacts page.

Prizes, Prizes!

This survey can be completed at any point during the three-month test period and please only complete it once. As an incentive to provide feedback, every week 10 users who complete a questionnaire will be selected at random to receive a complimentary gift. The winner will have a choice of a Library of Congress mug or a Library of Congress calendar. Check out this week's prize winners now posted on the CDS Web site!

Confidentiality

The information you provide will be used only to assess the potential for a Classification Web product and will not be shared with anyone outside the product development team. We encourage you to provide as complete a response as possible to help CDS make optimal product decisions, but only your email address is required to successfully submit the form. For further information on confidentiality check Privacy and Legal Notices found on the Class Web homepage.


I. Assessment of Product Features:

1. The Classification Web interface was originally designed for a technical services environment. What is your assessment of the product features as a cataloging tool?

TECHNICAL SERVICE Not relevant to tech services use So poor would prevent purchase Needs substantial improvement, but would not prevent purchase OK Good feature Reason would purchase product
Web access speed
Schedule and thesaurus-style data display
Weekly update of the data
Navigation tools (i.e., menus, buttons, links)
Search options
Accessibility in cataloging environment
Links to local OPAC
Table calculator feature
Subject correlation feature
Ability to add personal notes
MARC record display
Online Tutorial

 

2. Comments on product features in a cataloging environment:

3. Do you think Classification Web would be beneficial in a public service environment? If so, where?

Reference
Library patrons
Both reference and library patrons
Would not be useful for either reference or library patrons
No opinion

4. What is your assessment of the following product features for reference or library patron use?

 
PUBLIC SERVICE Not relevant to reference/ patron use So poor would prevent use Needs substantial improvement, but would not prevent purchase OK Good feature Reason would purchase product
Web access speed
Schedule and thesaurus style data display
Weekly update of data
Navigation tools (i.e., menus, buttons, links)
Search options
Accessibility in public service
Links to local OPAC
Table calculator feature
Subject correlation feature
Ability to add personal notes
MARC record display
Online Tutorial

4. Comments on product usage in a public service environment:

5. Classification Web currently offers the ability to create personal notes based on username. How would you use the notes feature in your library?


II. Product Combination Preference:

1. Which LC classification and subject heading products are used at your institution. (Choose as many as apply.)

LC Classification schedules in paper format
LC Subject Headings in paper format
Classification Plus CD-ROM product
None of the above

2. Classification Web currently offers access to LC Classification schedules and LC Subject Headings. Is this the optimal combination for you?

3. Further comments on product format combination preferences:

III. Product Purchase Preference:

1. Based on product functionality alone, would you buy Classification Web as a fee-for-service product?

2. Comments on your degree of interest in purchasing Classification Web.

3. If you were to subscribe to such a product, would it affect your purchase of LC Classification data in other formats?

4. If you were to subscribe to such a product, would it affect your purchase of LC Subject Headings in other formats?

5. What is your preference for product licensing structure.

6. Comments on licensing preference.

7. Given sufficient customer interest, CDS might offer Classification Web on an annual pricing schedule similar to the one listed below.

 
Solo user (username and password access), single personal notes file
$300s
Small site 1-4 simultaneous users (domain address access), single group notes file
$500s
Medium site 5-9 simultaneous users (domain address access), single group notes file
$600s
Large site 10 - 14 simultaneous users (domain address) single group notes file
$800s
Very large site 15-18 simultaneous users (domain address), single group notes file
$1,000
Unlimited simultaneous users (domain address) single group notes file
$1,500
Additional personal notes files (username and password access) for site licenses
$100

What would be your reaction to such a pricing schedule?

8. Comments on proposed pricing schedule:

9. Amount of time you spent using Classification Web before responding to this survey.

IV. Institution Profile:

1. Type of Institution.

2. Number of technical services staff in my institution:
3. Number of reference staff in my institution:

4. Number of staff at my institution who would be likely to USE Classification Web.

5. Number of library patrons at my institution who would be likely to USE Classification Web.

 

V. Platform Used:

1. CPU
2. RAM available

3. Type of Web access

4. Browser Type

5. Automated Library System (i.e., DRA, INNOPAC, etc.,)


6. OPAC has Web access: Yes No Don't know

7. Comments on platform information:

VI. Contact Information: (If you wish to receive further information on this product or be a prize recipient.)

Name:
Agency: (required)
Address:
City: State/Prov.:
Country: Postal code:
Email: (required)
Phone : Fax:

2. My work assignment is best described by the following: (Check as many as apply.)
Cataloging Acquisitions Reference Services Library Management Library Patron Other

3. Please send me updates on future plans for the Classification Web product:

By email.
By regular mail.
By both email and regular mail.
Please do not send me any information.

4. Choice of prize should you be a winner.

 

or

CLASS WEB HOME - More about the Pilot Test
Contacts
- CDS Home Page - Library of Congress Home Page


Comments: Cataloging Distribution Service
Last updated: March 30, 2001