To link to this article, copy this persistent link:
http://www.loc.gov/lawweb/servlet/lloc_news?disp3_l205404023_text

(Jun 10, 2014) On May 29, 2014, the Criminal Chamber of Italy's Supreme Court (Corte Suprema di Cassazione), upheld a Constitutional Court decision on the reduction of penalties for convictions for the sale of soft drugs. (Novità legislative: legge 28 aprile 2014, n. 67 contenente "Deleghe al Governo in materia di pene detentive non carcerarie e di riforma del sistema sanzionatorio. Disposizioni in materia di sospensione del procedimento con messa alla prova e nei confronti degli irreperibili," Supreme Court website (May 5, 2014).) The penalties had been applied under Decree-Law No. 272 of 2005 and its amendments until February 12, 2014. On that date, Italy's Constitutional Court had declared the partial unconstitutionality of that Decree-Law. (N. 148 Ordinanza 19-28 Maggio 2014, GAZZETTA UFFICIALE DELLA REPPUBLICA ITALIANA; Dante Figueroa, Italy: Legislation on Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Found Partially Unconstitutional, GLOBAL LEGAL MONITOR (Mar. 27, 2014).)

The Supreme Court Decision clarifies the implications of the Constitutional Court's February 2014 judgment. (Droga, la Corte Costituzionale boccia la legge Fini-Giovanardi: Incostituzionale, IL FATTO QUOTIDIANO (Feb. 12, 2014); Novità legislative: legge 28 aprile 2014, supra.) As a consequence of the Supreme Court Decision, the Iervolino Vassalli Law, which excluded prison sentences against persons convicted for trafficking in "soft" narcotics, enters into full effect. (Legge Iervolino Vassalli, Legge n. 162 del 1990, DIZIONARIO DEL CITTADINO (May 30, 2014); Legge Iervolino Vassalli, Legge 26 giugno 1990, n. 162, NORMATTIVA.)

The Supreme Court was called upon to issue a general ruling clarifying the interpretation of the legislation on narcotics and psychotropic substances. In particular, it was to decide whether a declaration of unconstitutionality of a law other than that under which a person was convicted, but which affects the penalty, requires a re-determination of the penalty during the sentencing phase. That is, it had to rule on whether the declaration of that a law that is illegitimate under the Constitution also overturns prior definitive convictions handed down under the previously valid law. The Court ruled in the affirmative. (Piccolo spaccio, fuori a migliaia, AVVENIRE.IT (May 29, 2014).)

The re-determination of penalties ordered by the decision also applies in cases of recidivism, when the mitigating circumstance of "mild character of the facts" was considered in the original sentencing. (Id.) As a result of the Decision, four to five thousand persons already serving sentences for crimes related to soft drugs may be eligible to leave prison. (Id.)

Author: Dante Figueroa More by this author
Topic: Constitution More on this topic
 Controlled substances More on this topic
 Crime and law enforcement More on this topic
Jurisdiction: Italy More about this jurisdiction

Search Legal News
Find legal news by topic, country, keyword, date, or author.

Global Legal Monitor RSS
Get the Global Legal Monitor delivered to your inbox. Sign up for RSS service.

The Global Legal Monitor is an online publication from the Law Library of Congress covering legal news and developments worldwide. It is updated frequently and draws on information from the Global Legal Information Network, official national legal publications, and reliable press sources. You can find previous news by searching the GLM.

Last updated: 06/10/2014