Africana Librarians Council Spring Meetingl
Boston University, May 4-6, 2006

Bibliography Committee Minutes
Friday, May 5, 2006, 9:00 – 10.30 am

Present: Ruby Bell-Gam (UCLA, chair); Elizabeth Darocha Berenz (CRL); Miriam Conteh-Morgan (Ohio State); David Easterbrook (Northwestern); Greg Finnegan (Harvard); Marion Frank-Wilson (Indiana); Karen Fung (Stanford); James Getner (LC); Miki Goral (UCLA); Cristina Horte (Ministry of Health Reference Center, Mozambique); Pamela Howard-Reguindin (LC Nairobi); Bassey Irele (Harvard); Al Kagan (Illinois-UC); Esmeralda Kale (Northwestern); Zbigniew Kantorosinski (LC); Patricia Kuntz (no institutional affiliation given); Joe Lauer (Michigan State); Deborah LaFond (Albany); Peter Limb (Michigan State); Heidi Lyons (BU); Peter Malanchuk (Florida); Loyd Mbabu (Ohio U); Edward Miner (Iowa); Tom Nygren (Aluka); Lauris Olson (Penn); Patricia Odedengbe (Northwestern); Laverne Page (LC); Loumona Petroff (BU); Beth Restrick (BU); Gretchen Walsh (BU); David Westley (BU).

Opening
The meeting was called to order by the chair, Ruby Bell-Gam, at 9:00 am.

1. Introductions
After introductions of all present, Bob Hudson, Director of Mugar Memorial Library briefly welcomed participants to BU.

2. Agenda Review, Announcements & Approval of Fall 2005 Minutes
Bell-Gam announced revisions to the agenda. Minutes of the Fall meeting were approved as submitted.

3. Conover-Porter Award update
Gretchen Walsh reported on behalf of the committee. Other members are Greg Finnegan, Marieta Harper, and Al Kagan who recused himself from selection deliberations because his book, Reference Guide to Africa, 2nd ed. (Scarecrow, 2005) is on the list of nominations for the award. Walsh reported that this year ten works were nominated. She highlighted one title, Maths in African History and Culture: An Annotated Bibliography, which she described as interesting but not quite fitting all the criteria for the award. This led to a discussion about issues such as the definition of a bibliography, selection criteria and eligibility that are not clearly stated in the guidelines. In particular, the committee would prefer more specific guidelines for defining an “excellent” work; they have been guided by David Henige’s criteria for creating bibliographies. The guidelines should also be clear about procedures on how to handle the case of a committee member whose work is on the nominated list.
Loyd Mbabu asked whether titles can be re-nominated. Walsh answered in the affirmative, as long as the work was still within the stipulated time frame for eligibility. In response to Bell-Gam’s question as to how to proceed with revising the guidelines, Peter Limb suggested that they should reflect current practice, and there should be a statement about what principles the committee should follow. Lauris Olson asked whether Henige’s article should serve as the guideline, or whether there are others out there that could be used. The suggestion was made to ask Diana Wylie (who is on the ASA Herskovits committee) about their guidelines to see how they may inform the Conover-Porter committee.

4. Guest Presentations

a. LC CAP (Library of Congress Cooperative Acquisitions Program) Update
Pamela Howard-Reguindin from LC Nairobi gave an overview of operations during her eight-month tenure thus far:

b. Cristina Horta, Ministry of Health, Mozambique
Horta is in the US on a National Library of Medicine fellowship. In her presentation, “Health Information Needs in Mozambique,” she gave a brief outline of the history of health services in Mozambique—which she said is 70% donor funded—and a description of the reference center where she works.

5. Dissertations

a. DATAD
Bell-Gam does not have any recent information on the DATAD program.

b. “Recent Doctoral Dissertations” in ASA News
Joe Lauer said that he does not include those from South Africa, since the bibliographic control there is good. He is considering publishing the dissertations list online since ASA News is cutting down the number of issues it publishes per year. Bell-Gam asked whether putting the dissertations lists online as an alternative would have copyright implications. Olson said UMI/Proquest seems pretty much okay with having copies of abstracts online.

6. Bibliographies

7 & 8. Problems in evaluating published works for acquisition; and how libraries are handling requests for articles cited in AJOL, NISC databases, etc.
Walsh asked whether there were procedures in place to deliver fulltext journal articles from AJOL and other such services. She also brought up the example of a recent H-Africa question asking about a “good” atlas for Africa. It turned out that a French one which was recommended had “racist” overtones. The larger question this raised was: how do you determine the utility or quality of a work you have not examined?

9. Newspaper preservation and archiving: what will be our legacy?
In the interest of time, this was deferred to a future forum.

The meeting was adjourned at 10.35.

Faithfully submitted,

Miriam Conteh-Morgan

Page Last Updated October 17, 2006