Notes
Outline
Slide 1
Overview of presentation
MARC and XML
MODS introduction
Uses
Features
Advantages
MODS relationship to other metadata schemes
MODS Projects
MARC and XML
Importance of descriptive metadata in current environment
Large investments in MARC systems
Retooling to make use of the flexibility of XML
Libraries may receive records using other metadata schemes in XML
Descriptive metadata may come as part of digital objects
Collaborative use of metadata for access
OAI harvesting
Z39.50 and SRU/SRW
Evolution of MARC 21
Need to take advantage of XML
Establish standard MARC 21 in an XML structure
Take advantage of freely available XML tools
Need simpler (but compatible) alternatives
Development of MODS
Need interoperability with different schemas
Assemble coordinated set of tools
Need continuity with current data
Provide flexible transition options
Slide 5
MARC 21 in XML – MARCXML
MARCXML record
XML exact equivalent of MARC (2709) record
Lossless/roundtrip conversion to/from MARC 21 record
Simple flexible XML schema, no need to change when MARC 21 changes
Presentations using XML stylesheets
LC provides converters (open source)
http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml
What is MODS?
Metadata Object Description Schema
Descriptive metadata standard
Initiative of Network Development and MARC Standards Office at LC
Uses XML Schema language
Originally designed for library applications, but may be used for others
A derivative of MARC
Potential Uses of MODS
As a rich (but not too rich) XML metadata format for emerging initiatives
SRU/SRW: search and retrieval XML format
METS
to represent metadata for harvesting (OAI)
As a core element set for convergence between MARC and non-MARC XML descriptions
For original resource description in XML syntax that is simpler than full MARC
Advantages of MODS
Element set is compatible with existing descriptions in large library databases
Element set is richer than Dublin Core but simpler than full MARC
Language tags are more user-friendly than MARC numeric tags
Hierarchy allows for rich description, especially of complex digital objects
Rich description that works well with hierarchical METS objects
Features of MODS
Uses language-based tags
Elements share definitions with equivalents in  MARC
Particularly applicable to digital resources
MODS does not assume the use of any specific rules for description
Element descriptions are reused throughout the schema
Some repackaging of redundant elements
Use of XML schema allows for flexibility and availability of freely available tools
MODS high-level elements
Title Info
Name
Type of resource
Genre
Origin Info
Language
Physical description
Abstract
Table of contents
Target audience
Note
Subject
Classification
Related item
Identifier
Location
Access conditions
Extension
Record Info
Status of MODS
Open listserv collaboration of possible implementors, LC coordinated (1st half 2002)
First comment and use period: June – December 2002
Version 2.0 Feb. 2003-Dec. 2003
MODS version 3.0 has been stable for over a year; about to issue 3.1
Registration approved by National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
Recently issued companion for authority metadata (MADS)
Relationship to other descriptive schemas?
Compatible with MARC
General purpose: not tied to particular type of material
Other descriptive metadata schemes:
DC (general resource discovery)
EAD (archival; finding aids)
ONIX (publishers)
VRA Core (visual resources)
CSGDM (geospatial)
TEI header (marked up text)
Differences between MODS and Dublin Core
MODS has structure
Names
Publication information (originInfo)
Related item
Subject
MODS is more compatible with library data
Semantics
Conversions
Relationships between elements
Includes record management (administrative metadata) information
MARCXML vs. MODS
Music record in MARC
Music record in MARCXML
Music record in MODS
LC uses of MODS
Describing electronic resources
AV project, web archiving
Incorporation with XML resources
METS projects for digital resources (e.g. IHAS, Blackmun)
OAI collections
LC offers MODS, MARCXML, DC simple
SRU/SRW: can get records in MODS
MINERVA at LC
MINERVA: LC’s web archiving project (based on specific themes)
Exploring issues with born digital resources
MODS used for descriptive metadata
Election 2002 Web archive
Collaboration with Internet Archive, Webarchivist.org
Selective collection of archived sites July-Nov. 2002
MODS records for each site (multiple captures)
Other collections: 9/11, 107th Congress, War in Iraq, Election 2004
Fields used in Minerva project
Title
Name (structured form)
Abstract
Date captured
Genre (value always “Web site”)
Physical description (file formats)
Identifier (base URL)
Language
Access conditions/rights management
Subject
Slide 19
Slide 20
Slide 21
Election 2002 Web Archive
MODS record in XML
107th Congress collection
Metadata and search page done at LC
107th Congress Collection search page
107th Congress Collection browse
Record display
Cataloging Web Archives Using MODS
Completed Record for Iraq War, 2003 Web Archive
Iraq War Web Archives
Air Force Times record in XML
I Hear America Singing
Creating METS objects
Use of Fedora digital repository software
MODS used for descriptive metadata
Display derived from METS/MODS objects
I Hear America Singing
http://www.loc.gov/ihas
Slide 27
Slide 28
Slide 29
MODS in IHAS
MODS XML record
METS document with MODS embedded
A few other MODS projects
MusicAustralia
MODS as exchange format between National Library of Australia and ScreenSoundAustralia
Allows for consistency with MARC data
http://www.musicaustralia.org/
Many METS based projects
Chopin Early Editions (University of Chicago Library)
Directions for MODS
Digital library projects
MODS works well with METS
Allows for description at any hierarchical level
Flexibility of schema may provide richer linking capability than MARC
LC use
Experiment with MODS for large collections of Web sites
Collection level record with link to MODS individual records
Exploring MODS tools for input and searching
Exploring integrating access with other records
Make available via Open Archives Initiative Protocol
Choosing MODS for descriptive metadata
MODS is particularly useful for
compatibility with existing bibliographic data
embedded descriptions in relatedItem
Rich, hierarchical descriptions that work well with METS structural map
“out of the box” schema; can use <extension> for local elements and to bring in external elements from other schemas
Slide 34