Periodical U.S. Reports: Smith v. Ely et al., 56 U.S. (15 How.) 137 (1854).
About this Item
Title
- U.S. Reports: Smith v. Ely et al., 56 U.S. (15 How.) 137 (1854).
Names
- Taney, Roger Brooke (Judge)
- Supreme Court of the United States (Author)
Created / Published
- 1853
Headings
- - Law
- - Patents
- - Patent infringement
- - Inventions
- - Law Library
- - Supreme Court
- - United States
- - Government Documents
- - Judicial review and appeals
- - Intellectual property
- - Telegraphs
- - Telecommunications
- - Improvements
- - Patentability
- - Prior art
- - U.S. Reports
- - Common law
- - Court opinions
- - Judicial decisions
- - Court cases
- - Court decisions
- - Damages
- - Point of novelty
- - Specificity
- - Sufficiency of disclosure
- - Specific
- - Periodical
Genre
- Periodical
Notes
- - Description: U.S. Reports Volume 56; Howard Volume 15; December Term, 1853; Francis O. J. Smith, Plaintiff, v. Heman B. Ely, Henry O'Reilly, Robert W. McCoy, Thomas Moodie, Michael R. Bateham, Lincoln Goodale, Wray Thomas, Albert B. Buttles and Robert Neil
Call Number/Physical Location
- series: Volume 56
- Call Number: KF101
- Series: Intellectual Property Law
Source Collection
- U.S. Reports
Online Format
- image
Part of
Subject
- Common Law
- Court Cases
- Court Decisions
- Court Opinions
- Damages
- Government Documents
- Improvements
- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property Law
- Inventions
- Judicial Decisions
- Judicial Review and Appeals
- Law
- Law Library
- Patent Infringement
- Patentability
- Patents
- Periodical
- Point of Novelty
- Prior Art
- Specific
- Specificity
- Sufficiency of Disclosure
- Supreme Court
- Telecommunications
- Telegraphs
- U.S. Reports
- United States