The Library of Congress >> Especially
for Librarians and Archivists >> StandardsThe Library of Congress >> Especially
for Librarians and Archivists >> Standards
HOME >> MARC Development >> Proposals List
DATE: December 21, 2022
REVISED:
NAME: Defining a Field for Ownership and Custodial History in Structured Form in the MARC 21 Formats
SOURCE: D-A-CH Working Group on Provenance, Task Group on MARC, in cooperation with the German National Library and the Committee on Data Formats
SUMMARY: This paper proposes how copy-specific ownership and custodial history information and material evidence represented by authority data and controlled terms can be accommodated in the MARC 21 Bibliographic, Holdings, and Authority formats, by the definition of a new field 361.
KEYWORDS: Field 361 (BD, AD, HD); Ownership and custodial history in structured form (BD, AD, HD); Field 561 (BD, HD); Ownership and custodial history (BD, HD)
STATUS/COMMENTS:
12/21/22 – Made available to the MARC community for discussion.
02/01/23 – Results of MARC Advisory Committee discussion: Approved, with the following amendments:
05/17/23 – Results of MARC Steering Group review - Agreed with the MAC decision.
For the cataloging of copy-specific ownership and custodial history information, authority control and authority data play an increasing role, both in terms of designating former ownership (by a person, by an institution, or in the context of a collection) and in terms of ownership evidence marks (such as autographs, insertions, bookplates, and stamps). The future development of international provenance research depends on the interoperability of data, including authority data. These data need to be sufficiently granular to accommodate the often complex information dealt with by research efforts in ownership and custodial history.
In the MARC formats, ownership and custodial history information is currently accommodated in an unstructured way as free text in note field 561 (Ownership and Custodial History). The Task Group on MARC of the D-A-CH Working Group on Provenance, in cooperation with the German National Library and the Committee on Data Formats, hereby proposes a more structured and data-driven way to express ownership and custodial history information in the MARC formats. A more thorough and extensive discussion of the background of this proposal can be found in Section 1 of the preceding Discussion Paper 2022-DP09.
There is a growing demand for standardized copy-specific ownership and custodial history data on the Item level. The implementation of such standards seems to prevail more and more in the field of cataloging historical holdings in libraries, archives, and museums. However, MARC 21 does not yet provide a possibility to interchange identifiers for authority data together with related terms for ownership and custodial history evidence.
In the preceding discussion paper, four options were laid out to accommodate the need: Field 561 (Ownership and Custodial History) is repeatable and offers a subfield $a for free text entries and a subfield $u for a URI referring to an external resource (Option 1). Linking authority records representing prior personal or corporate owners would only be possible by implementing subfield $8 (Field link and sequence number) in fields 561, 700 and 710 (Option 2). In order to avoid this not very popular technique, a subfield $0 could be added to field 561 for entering an authority record control number or standard number (Option 3). Aiming at accommodating authority data for prior ownership together with controlled terms on material evidence (from which the provenance information derives) in one and the same MARC 21 field, a new field in the 3XX range, namely field 361, was discussed as a possible solution (Option 4). This new field is based on the existing Pica3 field 9100 / Pica+ field 092B, and offers the opportunity to provide a clearer, more data-driven structure than the note field 561 is able to cover.
The new field should primarily be defined in the MARC 21 Holdings Format, because the information is copy-specific and located on the item level. The MARC 21 Bibliographic Format was taken into account, too, to provide an easier implementation, with an eye on limitations being dealt with by some library systems. And lastly, the MARC 21 Format for Authority Data was discussed for the new field, to cover information about ownership and custodial history of a Schriftdenkmal, or manifestation singleton, described in an authority record. So, a preference was given to choosing the same field number across all three formats, and the tag "361" was suggested, "rhyming" with tag "561". As a field name, “Provenance information” was suggested.
Out of only one data field, two separate links are pointing to two separate records of an authority file. A typical statement is: "With regard to this resource, this provenance mark indicates the prior ownership of this person." In the context of a new MARC field "361", this means that two subfields are needed, one for the authority record control number of the person (etc.), and another subfield for the authority record control number of a serial provenance mark. Similarly, subfield $2 was discussed, controlling the name, term or code subfields of a MARC field, plus the identifiers used in subfields $0 and $1, and the recently defined subfield $7 (Data provenance), with its data provenance element "dpesc" for a "source consulted".
During the discussion at the Annual meeting of the MARC Advisory Committee, as stated in the summary of Discussion Paper 2022-DP09 itself, "there was general agreement that copy-specific provenance information is important, but little agreement on how to move forward, with votes for all 4 options. If option 4, the definition of a new field, is explored, '361' would be acceptable as its tag. The use of the term 'provenance' should be avoided, and a phrase like 'custodial history' should be used instead. At the core of field 361, there is a statement like 'With regard to this resource, this provenance mark indicates the prior ownership of this person.' The primary focus on the Holdings format (although restricted by some ILS's) was welcomed by many MAC members, without leaving the Bibliographic format and the Authority format out of the equation. With regard to the Authority format, the matter of race and gender biases already present within library authority files have to be addressed. Field 561 may be enriched by some elements listed for the new field, but alternatively the new field 361 and field 561 would be able to co-exist effectively in the same record. Field 541 (Immediate Source of Acquisition Note) should also be taken into account. The subfields listed in the name group should be reduced significantly, as the new field is not a heading field; similarly, subfields $e and $4 are not needed. Special care should be taken of the linking subfields $0/$1 and $w, and their context in $2 and $7, respectively. Additions should be explored further, like the first indicator and its relationship to the RDA 'accrual method' vocabulary; subfield $3 (Materials specified), especially for serials; and definitions for the field, the first indicator and its values, and all of the subfields. New examples should reflect the direction taken. The paper will likely return as a proposal for the next MAC meeting."
We were glad to recognize that the primary focus on the Holdings format was welcomed by many colleagues. Our estimation is that field 361 in the Holdings format has the potential to be some kind of surrogate for the headings fields and the genre/form field 655 which are missing in the MARC Holdings format. It should be mentioned that it is not our intention to define fields 655 or fields 700/710/711 in the MARC Holdings format. We would be open to such an approach if another part of the MARC community will bring it up at a later time, though.
With regards to the Authority format and the matter of race and gender biases, the Working Group fully acknowledges this point, and would like to extend it further to other aspects and dimensions which can be affected by social and cultural biases. With an eye to book ownership and custodial history cataloging, we do see the opportunities: while usually a person can have an authority record by a book written about the person, or by a book written by the person, it is now possible to be identified as a former owner of an individual copy of a book, thus lowering the limitations significantly. "In most cases, provenance evidence left by quite ordinary people is more difficult to identify than those of well-known personalities. Yet such traces might be an important, if not the only source of biographical information. The book of devotion shown in ill. 1 contains a family history noted down by the former owner Hedwig von Stönne from Latvia which would otherwise be completely unknown" (source: Michaela Scheibe: The ‘Biography of Copies’: Provenance Description in Online Catalogues, in: Early printed books as material objects. Proceedings of the conference organized by the IFLA Rare Books and Manuscripts Section Munich, 19 - 21 August 2009, ed. by Bettina Wagner, Berlin 2010 (IFLA publications 149), p. 271 - 281, p. 271.)
Considering the four options and the contributions from various parts of the MARC community, our Working Group came to the conclusion that neither Option 1 (no changes) nor Option 2 (usage of subfield $8 to combine 561, 655 and 7XX fields) nor Option 3 (add subfield $0 and some other subfields to field 561) would be a promising and forward-thinking way to meet the requirements here. Option 1 would keep the status quo, and would mean the loss of data and the separation of parts of the community. Option 2 is not much more than a workaround with a high level of technical complexity, without meeting the needs. Option 3, the enrichment of field 561, has been especially discussed thoroughly. It is true that some note fields have evolved into well-structured and more data-driven solutions (among them field 502 and most recently the 506 and 540 fields for open access and license information). But we were not able to imagine a complete solution based on field 561, and so we came to the conclusion that field 561 would not be able to cover the entirety of the data-driven and authority-control-oriented approach which field 361 promises to provide.
In the course of the discussion, it was pointed out that defining a new field 361 parallel with the existing field 561 would increase the risk of bifurcated metadata. While we admit that the issue of redundant MARC elements exists in general as a well-known phenomenon, we argue that for different purposes (textual vs. data-driven), some groups of fields exist with good reasons in parallel with each other in the 3XX and 5XX regions, e.g., field 341 (Accessibility Content) defined at the same time as field 532 (Accessibility Note) in 2017/2018, and field 353 (Supplementary Content Characteristics) defined 2020/2021 in addition to the existing fields 504 (Bibliography, etc. Note) and 525 (Supplement Note).
Another argument was made about the impression of a high level of complexity of field 361 as laid out in the Discussion Paper. This impression seems to be based on the close equivalence between the new field and the existing K10plus field 9100 = 092B, documented online at https://swbtools.bsz-bw.de/cgi-bin/k10plushelp.pl?cmd=kat&val=9100 . Field 9100 has been used for some years now, resulting in more than a million occurrences of field 9100 in more than 400.000 bibliographic records. With its dense structure, field 9100 is the most ambitious model to reflect the results of provenance research and ownership and custodial history in a bibliographic format, and this structure has passed the usability test. At the same time, less ambitious models can be used here, and we are content that they will fit into the more complex framework. So, field 361 may be filled with much simpler combinations of subfields without any loss whenever the source data is less complex than e.g., field 9100.
All this is not to say that field 561 is reduced in its role and value. On the contrary, we expect the two fields to coexist in MARC records, not only for a period of transition from textual to data-driven cataloging, but also because field 561, as one colleague has pointed out, can sometimes express "uncertainty, conjecture, variants, summaries of external research, or other forms of expertizing that is the raw material of further research." In the new field 361, we now see subfields $x and $z as elements to carry this kind of free text information. In addition, field 561 plays a significant role in the eye-readable presentation of ownership and custodial history information which otherwise will have to be brought together from the single elements of field 361.
The point about field 541 (Immediate Source of Acquisition Note) in combination with field 361 is well-taken. In our view, field 541 describes the last step of a sometimes long history, the immediate acquisition by the institution which now holds the single copy. Field 541 has a different scope, and a specific structure with some subfields not too relevant for research into ownership and custodial history, but it can easily be combined with a 361 field, or with a sequence of 361 fields.
Considering the name of the new field, the Working Group appreciates the critical voices and agrees that in the MARC context, the term "provenance" should be reserved for data provenance as much as possible, so that confusion can be avoided significantly. With an eye to the name of field 561, we have discussed several suggested versions, e.g., "structured" / "formatted" / "controlled" / "standardized" in combination with "ownership and custodial history". We finally decided to propose "Ownership and custodial history in structured form" for a new field 361.
We were thankful for the estimation that the new field does not have to function as a headings field, so that the "names group" laid out in the Discussion Paper can be reduced to one subfield $a, simply called "Name", similar to field 342 (Geospatial Reference Data). At the same time, subfields $e and $4 do not have to be defined if they cause confusion. It might however be possible to add $e and $4 at a later time, if needed.
The issue of two links out of one field 361 into an authority file is based on the core information of a single field 361: "With regard to this resource, this provenance mark indicates the prior ownership of this person." In IFLA LRM terminology: a distinct Item (ISIL plus Item identifier) has Evidence (controlled terms, authority record) from Agents (authority record for personal/corporate name or collection). Continuing the approach taken in the preceding discussion paper, we no longer distinguish between identifier subfields for the person (etc.), and identifier subfields for the provenance mark. Leaving subfield $w behind, we now propose $0 / $1 for both a former owner or collection and, at the same time, for a provenance mark. Admittedly, we have two subfields $0 in one field 361, pointing to two different entities. Special care has then to be taken with regards to how in each single occurrence of field 361 the information can be formulated so that the statement as a whole remains clear enough.
At the same time, subfield $2 (Source) was discussed. Generally speaking, subfield $2 provides context information for the content of a field. $2 is always defined as a non-repeatable subfield. Given the fact that in many occurrences of field 361 we have one subfield $a and (at least) one subfield $f, often from different authority files and thesauri, one single subfield $2 would only cover half of the field content. Making subfield $2 repeatable would risk confusion.
Our idea is that subfield $2 should be omitted from the new field 361, and replaced by the recently defined, more flexible and repeatable subfield $7 (Data provenance). For the designation of the source consulted, it can contain "(dpesc/dpsfa)" plus a designation of the authority file or thesaurus from which the content of subfield $a (Name) has been taken, and it can contain "(dpesc/dpsff)" plus a designation of the authority file or thesaurus from which the content of subfield $f (Ownership and custodial history evidence term) is taken.
After a thorough discussion, the Task Group finally decided to omit subfield $2 from the Proposal, and to propose subfield $7 for the new field 361. In many cases, the context of subfield $a is sufficiently clear, and links to the authority record plus URIs are provided in subfields $0 and $1. Consequently, in our examples we only show subfield $7 relating to the content of subfield(s) $f. Here, we use either "rbprov" or "tpro" or "gnd" as codes, each of them taken from the list of Genre/Form Code and Term Source Codes, maintained by the Library of Congress.
We agree that subfield $3 (Materials specified) is a good candidate for addition to field 361, as it has potential to express ranges on a time-scale, especially when parts of a serial have different ownership and custodial history information.
Of importance has been the suggestion to compare the existing indicators for the type of ownership and custodial history information to the RDA vocabulary for an "accrual method", based on the recent discussion of the collections model. The vocabulary provides "concepts for a method of transfer of custodianship of the items that are added to a manifestation of a collection work." It is available at http://www.rdaregistry.info/termList/RDACollectionAccrualMethod/ , with the values "loan", "deposit", "donation", license", and "purchase", and their respective definitions. Based on these, we tried to extend the mapping between the coded values of the K10plus Pica field 9100=092B subfield $S and the values of indicator 1 "Type of ownership and custodial history information", by the RDA vocabulary for an "accrual method", resulting in the following table:
9100 $S |
9100 $S |
MARC 361, |
MARC |
RDA |
RDA |
(no $S) |
# |
(No information provided) |
|||
vb |
Vorbesitz |
0 |
Former ownership |
||
zu |
Zugang |
1 |
Accession |
||
ab |
Abgang |
2 |
Withdrawal |
||
au |
Ausleihe |
3 |
Temporal possession |
||
sl |
Sammlung |
4 |
Collection |
||
loan |
A collection accrual method that adds items to a collection for a fixed or open-ended timespan with no transfer of ownership or financial transaction. |
||||
deposit |
A collection accrual method that adds items to a collection permanently with no transfer of ownership or financial transaction. |
||||
donation |
A collection accrual method that adds items to a collection permanently with a transfer of ownership but no financial transaction. |
||||
license |
A collection accrual method that adds items to a collection for a fixed or open-ended timespan with no transfer of ownership but with a financial transaction. |
||||
purchase |
A collection accrual method that adds items to a collection permanently with a transfer of ownership and a financial transaction. |
Our impression is that there is no significant overlap between the two vocabularies. This may be based on the different approaches: While research and cataloging of ownership and custodial history has its focus on a single copy, the RDA vocabulary has its focus on collection building and its aspects. Nevertheless, we see the potential of the RDA vocabulary, because its values can be combined with the list of the MARC first indicator values (based on K10plus field 9100 subfield $S) which were already discussed. In summary, we now propose for field 361 the definition of a second indicator, named "Type of accession", and reflecting the names and definitions of the RDA "accrual method" vocabulary.
Because the idea of including a second indicator for "accrual method" in field 361 was made quite late in the process of creating this proposal, and because this kind of distinction is not (yet) used in the K10plus field 9100, the examples provided here do not illustrate specific values for the second indicator of field 361 at the moment.
Define a new field 361 in the MARC 21 Bibliographic, Holdings, and Authority formats as follows:
361 - Ownership and Custodial History in Structured Form (R)
Field Definition and Scope
The field contains copy-specific information in structured form, concerning the ownership and custodial history of the described materials from the time of their creation to the time of their accessioning. Textual information about each step in the biography of the copy can be added.
For comprehensive textual information about ownership and custodial history, field 561 (Ownership and Custodial History) is used. The immediate source of acquisition is recorded in field 541 (Immediate Source of Acquisition Note).Indicators
First Indicator - Type of ownership and custodial history information
Designates the type of ownership and custodial history, e.g., former ownership, accession, withdrawal, temporal possession, or collection.# - No information provided
0 – Former ownership
Indicates that the information in the field describes a former ownership.1 – Accession
Indicates that the information in the field describes an accession, e.g., an acquisition, including an accession number and date.2 – Withdrawal
Indicates that the information in the field describes a withdrawal, e.g., a restitution.3 – Temporal possession
Indicates that the information in the field describes a temporary change of ownership, e.g., a loan by a single person or to an exhibition.4 – Collection
Indicates that the information in the field describes a collection, e.g., the addition of the single copy to a larger context.Second Indicator - Type of accession
Designates the method of transfer of custodianship of the single copy which has been added to a collection
This indicator is based in the RDA vocabulary "Accrual method", which provides "concepts for a method of transfer of custodianship of the items that are added to a manifestation of a collection work".# - No information provided
0 - Loan
A collection accrual method that adds items to a collection for a fixed or open-ended timespan with no transfer of ownership or financial transaction.1 - Deposit
A collection accrual method that adds items to a collection permanently with no transfer of ownership or financial transaction.2 - Donation
A collection accrual method that adds items to a collection permanently with a transfer of ownership but no financial transaction.3 - License
A collection accrual method that adds items to a collection for a fixed or open-ended timespan with no transfer of ownership but with a financial transaction.4 - Purchase
A collection accrual method that adds items to a collection permanently with a transfer of ownership and a financial transaction.Subfields:
$a - Name (NR)
Name of the person, family, organization, jurisdiction or collection which has played a role in the ownership and custodial history of the copy described.
Includes dates, titles and other words associated with a personal name, and number or name of a section of a collection.$f – Ownership and custodial history evidence term (R)
The subfield contains terms representing types of copies (e.g., dedicatees' copies, authors' copies, presentation copies, etc.) as well as physical amendments (ownership evidence marks), such as autographs, insertions, bookplates, and stamps.
Preferably, the terms are taken from a controlled vocabulary, e.g., the RBMS Provenance Evidence Thesaurus, or the T-PRO thesaurus.
The thesaurus can be given in subfield $7 of the same field 361, with Data Provenance Category Code "dpsc" for Data provenance element source consulted, and Data Provenance Relationship Code "dpsff" to designate that the data provenance relates to subfield $f.$i - Date in structured form (NR)
The subfield contains date of accession or date of withdrawal and other date information.
Date is recorded in the format yyyymmdd in accordance with ISO 8601, Representation of Dates and Times$j – Date in unstructured form (NR)
The subfield contains an approximate date information or a date range of accession or withdrawal, and other unstructured date information.$s – Shelf mark of copy described (NR)
The subfield contains a shelf mark of the copy described, e.g., the location, classification and number of the copy.
In a Bibliographic or Holdings record, the content of subfield $s can be identical to information given in field 852 "Location".$u - Uniform Resource Identifier (R)
The subfield contains a URI pointing to additional information, e.g., the link to a representation of key pages of the copy described.$x – Nonpublic note (R)
Note relating to the ownership and custodial history described in the field. The subfield may also contain information about uncertainty, conjecture and variants. The note is written in a form that is not adequate or intended for public display.$y – Identifier of the copy described (NR)
The subfield contains the identifier of the copy described.
In a Holdings record, the content of subfield $y can be identical to the content of field 001. In a Bibliographic record, subfield $y provides a reference to a Holdings record, e.g., if the Holdings record itself does not provide ownership and custodial history information.$z – Public note (R)
Note relating to the ownership and custodial history described in the field. The subfield may also contain information about uncertainty, conjecture and variants. The note is written in a form that is adequate or intended for public display.$0 - Authority record control number or standard number (R)
The subfield contains an authority record control number / URI for a person, corporate body, jurisdiction as former owner, or collection. Alternatively, the subfield contains an authority record control number / URI for an ownership and custodial history evidence term.
See description of this subfield in Appendix A: Control Subfields.$1 - Real World Object URI (R)
See description of this subfield in Appendix A: Control Subfields.$3 - Materials specified (NR)
Information to differentiate the multiple statements of the described materials to which the field applies.$5 - Institution to which field applies (NR)
Designation of current ownership, i.e., the institution currently holding the copy.
In a Bibliographic or Holdings record, the content of subfield $5 can be identical to information given in field 852 (Location).
See description of this subfield in Appendix A: Control Subfields.$6 – Linkage (NR)
See description of this subfield in Appendix A: Control Subfields.$7 – Data provenance (R)
For MARC Bibliographic:
See description of this subfield in Appendix J: Data Provenance Subfields.
For MARC Holdings:
See description of this subfield in Appendix J of the MARC Format for Bibliographic Data: Data Provenance Subfields.
For MARC Authority:
See description of this subfield in Appendix H: Data Provenance Subfields.$8 - Field link and sequence number (R)
See description of this subfield in Appendix A: Control Subfields.
In field 561 (Ownership and Custodial History) of the MARC 21 Bibliographic and of the MARC 21 Holdings formats, we propose the following sentence to be added to the "field definition and scope" section:
"Ownership and custodial history in structured form, including links to an authority file, is recorded in field 361."
General note to the examples:
In some of the examples, German terms from the K10plus online catalog are given in English language, for reasons of readability. Similarly, for standardized recording of ownership and custodial history information in field 361, terms from the RBMS Provenance Evidence: A Thesaurus for Use in Rare Book and Special Collections Cataloguing were employed in some of the examples.
cf. http://explore.bl.uk/BLVU1:LSCOP-ALL:BLL01018491187
001
(Holdings record ID)004
018491187
040 ##$aUk $cUk
561 ## $aWith the armorial bookplate of: Frances Mary Richardson Currer.
852 4# $aBritish Library $jRB.23.a.12849
001
(Holdings record ID)004
018491187
040 ##$aUk $cUk
361 1# $aRichardson Currer, Frances Mary, 1785-1861 $farmorial bookplate
852 4# $aBritish Library $jRB.23.a.12849
001
(Holdings record ID)004
018491187
040 ##$aUk $cUk
361 1# $aRichardson Currer, Frances Mary, 1785-1861 $farmorial bookplate
561 ## $aWith the armorial bookplate of: Frances Mary Richardson Currer.
852 4# $aBritish Library $jRB.23.a.12849
cf. http://explore.bl.uk/BLVU1:LSCOP-ALL:BLL01018491187
001 018491187
040 ##$aUk $cUk
100 1# $aOliphant, $cMrs. $q(Margaret), $d1828-1897.
245 10 $aPassages in the life of Mrs. Margaret Maitland of Sunnyside / $cwritten by herself [i.e. by Mrs. Oliphant].
260 ##$aLondon :$bHenry Colburn,$c1851.
561 ## $aWith the armorial bookplate of: Frances Mary Richardson Currer.
700 1# $aCurrer, Frances Mary Richardson, $d1785-1861.
852 4# $aBritish Library $jRB.23.a.12849
001 018491187
040 ##$aUk $cUk
100 1# $aOliphant, $cMrs. $q(Margaret), $d1828-1897.
245 10 $aPassages in the life of Mrs. Margaret Maitland of Sunnyside / $cwritten by herself [i.e. by Mrs. Oliphant].
260 ##$aLondon :$bHenry Colburn,$c1851.
361 1# $5Uk $y(Holdings record ID) $sRB.23.a.12849 $aRichardson Currer, Frances Mary, 1785-1861 $farmorial bookplate
700 1# $aCurrer, Frances Mary Richardson, $d1785-1861.
852 4# $aBritish Library $jRB.23.a.12849
001 018491187
040 ##$aUk $cUk
100 1# $aOliphant, $cMrs. $q(Margaret), $d1828-1897.
245 10 $aPassages in the life of Mrs. Margaret Maitland of Sunnyside / $cwritten by herself [i.e. by Mrs. Oliphant].
260 ##$aLondon :$bHenry Colburn,$c1851.
361 1# $5Uk $y(Holdings record ID) $sRB.23.a.12849 $aRichardson Currer, Frances Mary, 1785-1861 $farmorial bookplate
561 ## $aWith the armorial bookplate of: Frances Mary Richardson Currer.
700 1# $aCurrer, Frances Mary Richardson, $d1785-1861.
852 4# $aBritish Library $jRB.23.a.12849
cf. https://opac.k10plus.de/DB=2.299/PPNSET?PPN=1725230380
001 1725230380
003 DE-627
100 1#$aCastle, Egerton$d1858-1920$eAuthor$0(DE-588)172031117$0(DE-627)704724626$0(DE-576)356513696$4aut
245 10$aSchools and masters of fence$bfrom the middle ages to the eighteenth century : with a complete bibliography : illustrated with reproductions of old engravings and representations of typical swords$cby Egerton Castle, M.A., F.S.A.
264 1#$aLondon$aNew York$bGeorge Bell & Sons, York St., Covent Garden$c1892
361 0#$5DE-39$y3727014024$sH 8° 10018$aCapstick, John Walton$0(DE-588)121086634X$0https://d-nb.info/gnd/121086634X$fbookplate$7(dpesc/dpsff)rbprov$0(DE-588)1211584690$0https://d-nb.info/gnd/1211584690
cf. https://opac.k10plus.de/DB=2.299/PPNSET?PPN=323491057
4.4.1. Bibliographic record
001 323491057
003 DE-627
035 ## $a(OCoLC)248301029
100 1# $aZschokke, Heinrich $d1771-1848 $0(DE-588)118637266 $0(DE-627)133369676 $0(DE-576)163682755 $4aut
245 10 $aHeinrich Zschokke's ausgewählte Schriften $nNeununddreißigster Teil $pAbellino
264 1# $aAarau $bSauerländer $c1828
300 ## $a334 S., [5] Bl
500 ## $aIn Fraktur
773 18 $w(DE-627)145990389 $gNeununddreißigster Teil $q39.1828 $7nnnm
4.4.2. Holdings record A
001 422108138
004 323491057
361 3# $5DE-32 $y422108138 $sDd 4 : 118 (39) $aGoethe, Johann Wolfgang –von-, 1749-1832 $0(DE-588)118540238 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/118540238$j1831-06-09 bis 1831-07-21 $zQuelle Ausleihjournal; Goethe-Ausleihen Weimar Nr. 2235 (Keudell-Nr. 2210)
361 4# $5DE-32 $y422108138 $sDd 4 : 118 (39) $aSammlung Ausleihen Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Weimar $0(DE-588)1207789658 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/1207789658
852 ## $aDE-32 $cDd 4 : 118 (39)
4.4.3. Holdings record B
001 422115126
004 323491057
361 0# $5DE-32 $y422115126 $sN 1751 (39) $aStein-Kochberg, Felix –von-, 1828- $0(DE-588)117244740 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/117244740
361 0# $5DE-32 $y422115126 $sN 1751 (39) $aSchwerin, Woldemar –von-, 1896-1981 $0(DE-588)126798885 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/126798885$fBodenreform $7(dpesc/dpsff)gnd $0(DE-588)4146165-4 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/4146165-4$i1945 $zKulturgutentziehung
361 0# $5DE-32 $y422115126 $sN 1751 (39) $aGoethe- und Schiller-Archiv, Bücherei $0(DE-588)1064119859 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/1064119859$fStempel $7(dpesc/dpsff)gnd $0(DE-588)4183099-4 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/4183099-4$i19540507$ zHerkunft lt. Zugangsbuch: Schloß Groß-Kochberg, Zugangsdatum: 07.05.1954
361 2# $5DE-32 $y422115126 $sN 1751 (39) $aHerzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek $0(DE-588)5038969-5 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/5038969-5$fRestitution $7(dpesc/dpsff)tpro $i2014 $zRestitution an die Rechtsnachfolger
361 1# $5DE-32 $y422115126 $sN 1751 (39) $aHerzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek $0(DE-588)5038969-5 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/5038969-5$fRestitutionsexemplar $7(dpesc/dpsff)tpro $i201 4 $zAnkauf nach Restitution
361 4# $5DE-32 $y422115126 $sN 1751 (39) $aBibliothek Grünes Zimmer $0(DE-588)1194682502 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/1194682502
361 4# $5DE-32 $y422115126 $sN 1751 (39) $aSammlung von Stein-Kochberg $0(DE-588)1194682405 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/1194682405
852 ## $aDE-32 $cN 1751 (39)
cf. http://corsair.themorgan.org/vwebv/holdingsInfo?bibId=171088
001 171088
100 1# $aKnox, Vicesimus, $d1752-1821.
245 10 $aElegant extracts : $bor useful and entertaining passages in prose ...
250 ## $aSecond edition ...
260 ## $aDublin : $bP. Byrne, $c1793.
361 0# $5NNPM $y(Holdings record ID) $sE3 091 A $zWith the signature of Jane Thoreau, aunt of Henry D. Thoreau on fly-leaf; presented to William Allen by Miss Sophia E. Thoreau, June 13, 1872; John L. Cooley.
501 ## $aHandwritten bibliographic note, originally laid in, now in departmental file. $5NNPM
541 1# $cGift of $aJohn L. Cooley, $d1961. $5NNPM
563 ## $aBrown leather. $5NNPM
700 1# $aCooley, John L., $eformer owner. $5NNPM
700 1# $aThoreau, Jane, $eformer owner. $5NNPM
700 1# $aThoreau, Sophia E., $eformer owner. $5NNPM
852 ## $aPierpont Morgan Library $bDept. of Printed Books
cf https://opac.k10plus.de/DB=2.299/PPNSET?PPN=477923674
001 477923674
003 DE-627
026 ## $er-ent.vnenn. inwo 3 1585R $2fei
035 ## $a(OCoLC)254602636
245 10 $aKirchenGesäng, So bey der Predigt deß Göttlichen worts vnd außspendung der H. Sacramenten in den Kirchen Augspurgischer Confession, gebraucht werden $bAuß den besten Gesangbüchern ... in ein richtige gute Ordnung gebracht, vnd zum fleissigsten corrigieret vnd gebessert $cDurch den Wolgelehrten Herren Eucharium Zinckeisen, Pfarherrn zu Langen
264 1# $aFranckfurt am Meyn $bFeyrabend $c1585
264 1# $aFranckfurt am Meyn $bLechler $c1585
300 ## $a351, [8] Bl. $c12°
361 0# $5DE-39 $y695277863 $sCant.spir 8° 00623 $aRüffer, Neithard, 1580-1593 $0(DE-588)1215289650 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/1215289650$fAutograph $7(dpesc/dpsff)rbprov $i1590 $zHerbipolensis
361 0# $5DE-39 $y695277863 $sCant.spir 8° 00623 $aRüffer, Anton $0(DE-588)124676405 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/124676405
361 4# $5DE-39 $y695277863 $sCant.spir 8° 00623 $aRüffer, Anton $0(DE-588)1243536829 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/1243536829$zCatalogue of the Rüffer Library 1637, Libri Theologici 8°, No. 253 (City Archives Schweinfurt, Ha 160)
361 0# $5DE-39 $y695277863 $sCant.spir 8° 00623 $aHerzogliche Bibliothek (Gotha) $0(DE-588)815650-5 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/815650-5$aStamp $7(dpesc/dpsff)rbprov $0(DE-588)1218267992 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/1218267992
500 ## $aFingerprint nach dem Ex. der FB Gotha
500 ## $aErscheinungsvermerk im Kolophon: Getruckt zu Franckfurt am Meyn, bey Martin Lechler, in verlegung Sigmund Feyrabend
510 3# $aVD16 K 929
655 7# $aGesangbuch $0(DE-627)096631791 $2local
700 1# $aZinckeisen, Eucharius $0(DE-588)138520801 $0(DE-627)696687232 $0(DE-576)307906108 $4oth
700 1# $aFeyerabend, Sigmund $d1528-1590 $0(DE-588)118683527 $0(DE-627)13457317X $0(DE-576)160937299 $4prt
700 1# $aLechler, Martin $d15XX-1594 $0(DE-588)1037503880 $0(DE-627)756075440 $0(DE-576)391562495 $4prt
cf. https://opac.k10plus.de/DB=2.299/PPNSET?PPN=1029478546
361 1# $5DE-1 $y575632259 $sVq 5270-2 $aKönigliche Bibliothek zu Berlin $0(DE-588)37101-4 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/37101-4$fStempel $7(dpesc/dpsff)t-pro $jvor 1840 $zDoppelrandiger Stempel Ex Biblioth. Regia Berolinensi.
361 3# $5DE-1 $y575632259 $sVq 5270-2 $aPreußische Staatsbibliothek $0(DE-588)37102-6 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/37102-6$fZensurexemplar $fGrafisches Zeichen $7(dpesc/dpsff)t-pro $zAuf der Titelseite blaues Dreieck nach unten.
361 2# $5DE-1 $y575632259 $sVq 5270-2 $aPreußische Staatsbibliothek $0(DE-588)37102-6 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/37102-6$fBeutegut $7(dpesc/dpsff)t-pro $jca. 1945 $zAus verlagerten Beständen in die Sowjetunion abtransportiert und laut Zeitzeugenbericht 1953 mit anderem Beutegut in zwei Güterwaggons in Duschanbe (Tadschikistan) angekommen.
361 0# $5DE-1 $y575632259 $sVq 5270-2 $aEisener, Reinhard $fMonogramm $7(dpesc/dpsff)t-pro $jca. 1995 $zMonogramm rh (gedreht: E) auf dem Vorsatz. Als Geschenk in Duschanbe (dort seit 1953 in Privatbesitz) erworben.
361 0# $5DE-1 $y575632259 $sVq 5270-2 $aNN $fNotiz $7(dpesc/dpsff)t-pro $zMit Bleistift auf der Titelseite notierte Initialen Ch [?]
361 1# $5DE-1 $y575632259 $sVq 5270-2 $aStaatsbibliothek zu Berlin $0(DE-588)5036103-X $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/5036103-X$fRestitutionsexemplar $7(dpesc/dpsff)t-pro $i20180824 $zGeschenk von Dr. Reinhard Eisener, Berlin
cf. http://explore.bl.uk/BLVU1:LSCOP-ALL:BLL01000460947
001 000460947
003 Uk
040 ## $aCU-RivES $cCU-RivES $dCStRLIN $dCU-RivES $dUk-ES $edcrb
100 1# $aGriffith, Richard, $d1635?-1691.
245 10 $aSome observations made upon the Brasillian root, called ipepocoanha: $bimported from the Indies: shewing its wonderful virtue against vomiting and loosness. $cWritten by a physitian in the countrey to the president of the Colledge of Physitians in London.
264 1# $aLondon : $b[s.n.], $cprinted &c. 1682.
300 ## $a7, [1] pages ; $c20 cm (4º)
340 ## $m4to $2rdabf
361 0# $5Uk $y(Holdings record ID) $sB.615.(1) $aBanks, Joseph, 1743-1820 $fstamp $7(dpesc/dpsff)rbprov
361 0# $5Uk $y(Holdings record ID) $s778.e.41.(12.) $aSloane, Hans, 1660-1753 $0(isni)ISN:0000000123196729 $1https://isni.org/isni/0000000123196729 $finscriptions $7(dpesc/dpsff)rbprov $zFormerly owned by Sir Hans Sloane, whose library became one of the founding collections of the British Museum and the British Library. Contains manuscript notes and/or inscriptions which indicate Sloane ownership. Manuscript inscription in Sloane's hand on page 3: "The Brazilian root here meant is the Ipecuacuanha".
500 ## $aAttributed to Richard Griffith by Halkett and Laing. Also attributed to John Pechey and to John Peachi.
510 4# $aWing (CD-ROM, 1996), $cG2019A
700 1# $3Copy at 778.e.41.(12.)., $aSloane, Hans, $cSir, $d1660-1753 $eformer owner. $1http://isni.org/isni/0000000123196729 $5Uk
752 ## $aGreat Britain $bEngland $dLondon.
700 1# $aPeachi, John, $dactive 1683, $eattributed name.
700 1# $aPechey, John, $d1655-1716, $eattributed name.
700 1# $aBanks, Joseph, $d1743-1820, $eformer owner.$5Uk
700 1# $aMicklethwaite, John, $cSir, $d1612-1682, $eaddressee
852 41 $aBritish Library $bHMNTS $5546.g.18.(6)
852 41 $aBritish Library $bHMNTS $5B.615.(1)
852 41 $aBritish Library $bHMNTS $5778.e.41.(12) $qCopy at 778.e.41.(12.). Imperfect: wanting the title page.
cf. https://opac.k10plus.de/DB=2.299/PPNSET?PPN=374776245
361 0# $5DE-1 $y686198638 $sYu 9411 $aHeyse, Karl Wilhelm Ludwig $0(DE-588) 118774360 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/118774360$fAutogramm $7(dpesc/dpsff)t-pro $0(DE-588) 1072781654 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/1072781654$i184304 $zAuf dem Vorsatz hs. Besitzvermerk: KWL Heyse, Berlin 1843 April.
361 1# $5DE-1 $y686198638 $sYu 9411 $aKönigliche Bibliothek zu Berlin $0(DE-588) 37101-4 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/37101-4$fZugangsnummer Hey 1769 $7(dpesc/dpsff)t-pro $jnach Juni 1854 $zNummer aus dem Heyse-Katalog (Stargardt 1854), auch auf dem hinten eingeklebten Reiter $uhttps://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/view/bsb10857428?page=128,129
cf. https://opac.k10plus.de/DB=2.299/PPNSET?PPN=167471791
361 0# $5DE-1 $y586641386 $sNb 4636<a> $314.1923 $aGrosse Landesloge der Freimaurer von Deutschland, Bibliothek $0(DE-588)16326833-2 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/16326833-2$fBibliotheksexemplar $fStempel $7(dpesc/dpsff)t-pro $0(DE-588)1169173209 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/1169173209$z1 Band: Roter Stempel auf dem vorderen Spiegel: Wolfstieg Nr. [gestrichen].
361 0# $5DE-1 $y586641386 $sNb 4636<a> $35.1914 - 7.1916 $aGrosse Landesloge der Freimaurer von Deutschland, Bibliothek $0(DE-588)16326833-2 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/16326833-2$fBibliotheksexemplar $fSignatur E 27a $fTektur $7(dpesc/dpsff)t-pro $z3 Bände: Geschwärzter handschriftlicher Eintrag im Stempel: E 27a [letzter Buchstabe fraglich].
361 0# $5DE-1 $y586641386 $sNb 4636<a>$310.1919 $aProvinzial-Großloge von Hamburg in Berlin, Bibliothek $0(DE-588)1075832624 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/1075832624$fBibliotheksexemplar $fStempel $fTektur $7(dpesc/dpsff)t-pro $0(DE-588)1077383622 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/1077383622$z1 Band: Geschwärzter rechteckiger Stempel auf dem Titelblatt: Bibliothek der Provinzial-Großloge von Hamburg in Berlin.
361 1# $5DE-1 $y586641386 $sNb 4636<a> $31.1910 - 10. 1919; 14.1923 $aÖffentliche Wissenschaftliche Bibliothek $0(DE-588)37103-8 $0http://d-nb.info/gnd/37103-8$fNS-Raubgut: Verdacht $7(dpesc/dpsff)t-pro $z11 Bände: Verdacht auf NS-Raubgut.
cf. https://d-nb.info/gnd/1219032743
001 1219032743
003 DE-101
075 ## $bu $2gndgen
075 ## $bwis $2gndspec
130 #0 $aHandschrift $gBritish Library $nRoyal Ms. 13 E IV
361 0# $0(DE-588)118820915 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/118820915$aJean, Berry, Herzog, 1340-1416
361 0# $0(DE-588)119427672 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/119427672$aNorfolk, Thomas Howard -of-, 1473-1554
361 0# $0(DE-588)118548204 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/118548204$aHenry, VIII, England, King 1491-1547
361 ## $0(DE-588)1023420-2 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/1023420-2$aBritish Library
430 #0 $aManuscript $gBritish Library $nRoyal MS 13 E IV
430 #0 $aGuillaume de Nangis: Chronicon $gBritish Library $nRoyal 13 E IV
430 #0 $aManuscript $gBritish Library $nRoyal 13 E IV
548 ## $aca. early 14th c. $4dats $4https://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#dateOfProduction$wr $idate of production
551 ## $0(DE-588)4018145-5 $0https://d-nb.info/gnd/4018145-5$aFrance $4orth $4https://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#placeOfManufacture$wr $iplace of manufacture
678 ## $bOrigin: France. Provenance: Jean Duc de Berry and Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk, then in the library of Henry VIII
The BIBFRAME ontology has the property "custodialHistory", for "Information about the provenance, such as origin, ownership and custodial history (chain of custody), of a resource", see https://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe.html#p_custodialHistory.
An editorial note has been added in June 2021, which reads: "See also the ARM Ontology for strategies to model this information in greater detail", with a link to the "Art and Rare Materials (ARM) BIBFRAME Ontology Extensions" at https://github.com/Art-and-Rare-Materials-BF-Ext/arm.
During the discussion in June 2022, it has been mentioned that "the Art and Rare Materials (ARM) extension to BIBFRAME defines separate classes for Custodial history and Marking. Examples are given on pages 34-36 of the ARM 1.0 implementation guidelines (PDF - accessible through Git Hub). "Though both are associated with an Item entity", there doesn't seem to be "a method in the modeling for asserting connections between a specific marking and related custodial history, as proposed in the current discussion paper." (see https://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2206&L=MARC&P=12334 )
6.1. In the MARC 21 Bibliographic, Holdings and Authority formats, define field 361 as follows (see Section 3.1. for a full description fo the field):
361 - Ownership and Custodial History in Structured Form (R)
Indicators
First Indicator – Type of ownership and custodial history information
# - No information provided
0 - Former ownership
1 - Accession
2 - Withdrawal
3 - Temporal possession
4 - Collection
Second indicator – Type of accession
# - No information provided
0 - Loan
1 - Deposit
2 - Donation
3 - License
4 - PurchaseSubfield Codes
$a - Name (NR)
$f - Ownership and custodial history evidence term (R)
$i - Date in structured form (NR)
$j - Date in unstructured form (NR)
$s - Shelf mark of copy described (NR)
$u - Uniform Resource Identifier (R)
$x - Nonpublic note (R)
$y - Identifier of the copy described (NR)
$z - Public note (R)
$0 - Authority record control number or standard number (R)
$1 - Real World Object URI (R)
$3 - Materials specified (NR)
$5 - Institution to which field applies (NR)
$6 - Linkage (NR)
$7 - Data provenance (R)
$8 - Field link and sequence number (R)
6.2. Adjust the "field definition and scope" section of field 561(Ownership and Custodial History) in the MARC 21 Bibliographic and Holdings formats, as laid out in Section 3.2. of this paper.
HOME >> MARC Development >> Proposals List
| The Library of Congress >> Especially for Librarians and Archivists >> Standards (05/17/2023) |
Legal | External Link Disclaimer | Contact Us |