{
link: "https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2016652883/",
thumbnail:{
url :"https://cdn.loc.gov/service/pnp/ppmsca/50900/50995_150px.jpg",
alt:'Image from Prints and Photographs Online Catalog -- The Library of Congress'
}
}
Larger images display only at the Library of Congress
JPEG(136kb)
| JPEG(0.7mb)
| TIFF(208.9mb)
http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.50995
Related
Capital punishment lawyer Anthony Amsterdam
- Title: Capital punishment lawyer Anthony Amsterdam / Brodie.
- Creator(s): Brodie, Howard, 1915-2010, artist
- Date Created/Published: [Place not identified] : [Publisher not identified], [1970]
- Medium: 1 drawing on white paper : inpriomia color and crayon ; sheet 45.7 x 61 cm.
- Summary: Drawing shows attorney Anthony Amsterdam presenting an argument before the United States Supreme Court against capital punishment.
- Reproduction Number: LC-DIG-ppmsca-50995 (digital file from original drawing)
- Rights Advisory:
Publication may be restricted. For information see "Howard Brodie (1915-2010) Rights and Restrictions Information,"(http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/res/435_brod.html)
- Access Advisory: Served by appointment (Unprocessed). To make a request, see "Access to Unprocessed Materials,"(http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/info/022_unpr.html)
- Call Number: Unprocessed in PR 13 CN 1977:201.36 [item] [P&P]
- Repository: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pp.print
- Notes:
- Caption label from exhibit Drawing Justice: Death Penalty Argued Before the Supreme Court. Lawyer Anthony Amsterdam made a specialty of arguing death penalty cases before the Supreme Court, culminating in the 1972 case Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238. Amsterdam had worked through the NAACP's Legal and Educational Defense Fund, building up a case that death penalty sentences, while rarely carried out, were handed down to disproportionate numbers of African Americans. Instead of focusing on the violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Amsterdam castigated the flawed procedure of jury selection and instruction. Here in one of his earlier cases, Maxwell v. Bishop, 398 U.S. 262 (1970), Amsterdam demonstrated one of the problems with jury selection. In this case the court found a death sentence cannot be carried out if the jury automatically excluded jurors who voiced general objections to the death penalty.
- Title from item.
- Signed and dated on lower right corner.
- Exhibited: "Drawing Justice" at the Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson Building, Washington, D.C., April - October 2017.
- Subjects:
- Format:
- Collections:
- Bookmark This Record:
https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2016652883/
View the MARC Record for this item.
The Library of Congress generally does not own rights to material in its collections and, therefore, cannot grant or deny permission to publish or otherwise distribute the material. For further rights information, see "Rights Information" below and the Rights and Restrictions Information page ( https://www.loc.gov/rr/print/res/rights.html ).
- Rights Advisory: Publication may be restricted. For information see "Howard Brodie (1915-2010) Rights and Restrictions Information," http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/res/435_brod.html
- Reproduction Number: LC-DIG-ppmsca-50995 (digital file from original drawing)
- Call Number: Unprocessed in PR 13 CN 1977:201.36 [item] [P&P]
- Medium: 1 drawing on white paper : inpriomia color and crayon ; sheet 45.7 x 61 cm.
If an image is displaying, you can download it yourself. (Some images display only as thumbnails outside the Library of Congress because of rights considerations, but you have access to larger size images on site.)
Alternatively, you can purchase copies of various types through Library of Congress Duplication Services.
- If a digital image is displaying: The qualities of the digital image partially depend on whether it was made from the original or an intermediate such as a copy negative or transparency. If the Reproduction Number field above includes a reproduction number that starts with LC-DIG..., then there is a digital image that was made directly from the original and is of sufficient resolution for most publication purposes.
- If there is information listed in the Reproduction Number field above:
You can use the reproduction number to purchase a copy from Duplication
Services. It will be made from the source listed in the parentheses after
the number.
If only black-and-white ("b&w") sources are listed and you desire a copy showing color or tint (assuming the original has any), you can generally purchase a quality copy of the original in color by citing the Call Number listed above and including the catalog record ("About This Item") with your request.
- If there is no information listed in the Reproduction Number field above: You can generally purchase a quality copy through Duplication Services. Cite the Call Number listed above and include the catalog record ("About This Item") with your request.
Price lists, contact information, and order forms are available on the Duplication Services Web site.
- Call Number: Unprocessed in PR 13 CN 1977:201.36 [item] [P&P]
- Medium: 1 drawing on white paper : inpriomia color and crayon ; sheet 45.7 x 61 cm.
- Access Advisory: Served by appointment (Unprocessed). To make a request, see "Access to Unprocessed Materials," http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/info/022_unpr.html
Please use the following steps to determine whether you need to fill out a call slip in the Prints and Photographs Reading Room to view the original item(s). In some cases, a surrogate (substitute image) is available, often in the form of a digital image, a copy print, or microfilm.
-
Is the item digitized? (A thumbnail (small) image will
be visible on the left.)
-
Yes, the item is digitized. Please use the digital image in preference to requesting the original. All images can be viewed at a large size when you are in any reading room at the Library of Congress. In some cases, only thumbnail (small) images are available when you are outside the Library of Congress because the item is rights restricted or has not been evaluated for rights restrictions.
As a preservation measure, we generally do not serve an original item when a digital image is available. If you have a compelling reason to see the original, consult with a reference librarian. (Sometimes, the original is simply too fragile to serve. For example, glass and film photographic negatives are particularly subject to damage. They are also easier to see online where they are presented as positive images.)
-
No, the item is not digitized. Please go to #2.
-
-
Do the Access Advisory or Call Number fields above indicate that
a non-digital surrogate exists, such as microfilm or copy prints?
-
Yes, another surrogate exists. Reference staff can direct you to this surrogate.
-
No, another surrogate does not exist. Please go to #3.
-
-
If you do not see a thumbnail image or a reference to another surrogate, please fill out a call slip in the Prints and Photographs Reading Room. In many cases, the originals can be served in a few minutes. Other materials require appointments for later the same day or in the future. Reference staff can advise you in both how to fill out a call slip and when the item can be served.
To contact Reference staff in the Prints and Photographs Reading Room, please use our Ask A Librarian service or call the reading room between 8:30 and 5:00 at 202-707-6394, and Press 3.