Rose Wilder Lane says Ludlow Resolution is needed as check on government. Washington, D.C., May 10. Rose Wilder Lane, writer, today urged support of the Ludlow Resolution which is being considered by a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee. She supported it on the grounds that it would 'carry forward the American process of government,' and followed by saying that it is another check on government. We need more checks on government. The bill, if passed, would make aggressive war by the United States subject to vote by the people

{
        link: "https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2016875620/",
		
		thumbnail:{
            url :"https://cdn.loc.gov/service/pnp/hec/26600/26664_150px.jpg",
            alt:'Image from Prints and Photographs Online Catalog -- The Library of Congress'
        }
        
		
    }

Bibliographic Information

Rose Wilder Lane says Ludlow Resolution is needed as check on government. Washington, D.C., May 10. Rose Wilder Lane, writer, today urged support of the Ludlow Resolution which is being considered by a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee. She supported it on the grounds that it would 'carry forward the American process of government,' and followed by saying that it is another check on government. We need more checks on government. The bill, if passed, would make aggressive war by the United States subject to vote by the people

Digital ID: (digital file from original negative) hec 26664 http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/hec.26664
Reproduction Number: LC-DIG-hec-26664 (digital file from original negative)
Repository: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pp.print

back to bibliographic information About This Item download this image JPEG (43kb) | JPEG (106kb) | TIFF (19.2mb) | TIFF (153.2mb)

Rose Wilder Lane says Ludlow Resolution is needed as check on government. Washington, D.C., May 10. Rose Wilder Lane, writer, today urged support of the Ludlow Resolution which is being considered by a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee. She supported it on the grounds that it would 'carry forward the American process of government,' and followed by saying that it is another check on government. We need more checks on government. The bill, if passed, would make aggressive war by the United States subject to vote by the people

Library of Congress

Prints & Photographs Online Catalog

Connect with the Library

Find Us On

Subscribe & Comment

Download & Play

Questions